Representations and Warranties Insurance provider comparisons
Source-based provider comparisons for representations and warranties insurance.
AIG vs Baldwin: Representations and Warranties Insurance
AIG advertises up to $100 million per R&W transaction with a typical retention reference; The Baldwin Group brokers transaction-risk coverage and offers due diligence and claims advocacy.
AIG vs Beazley: Representations and Warranties Insurance
AIG advertises R&W limits up to $100 million; Beazley describes buyer- and seller-side protection and advertises up to $50 million, including selected tax and contingent liabilities.
AIG vs Berkshire Hathaway Specialty Insurance: Representations and Warranties Insurance
AIG writes R&W through non-admitted subsidiaries or affiliates and advertises up to $100 million per transaction; Berkshire Hathaway Specialty Insurance lists the product and portfolio capacity up to $25 million.
AIG vs CFC: Representations and Warranties Insurance
AIG advertises up to $100 million of R&W capacity; CFC offers transaction-liability limits up to $50 million and separate small-deal Buyer Protect and Seller Protect products below $20 million.
AIG vs Chubb: Representations and Warranties Insurance
AIG offers transaction-specific R&W to buyers or sellers with shared, layered and excess structures; Chubb underwrites buyer- and seller-side policies for negotiated indemnity risks.
AIG vs Corgi: Representations and Warranties Insurance
AIG describes transaction structures and M&A support for R&W; Corgi lists the coverage as specialty coverage outside its instant quote flow.
AIG vs Coverdash: Representations and Warranties Insurance
AIG describes transaction structures for representations and warranties coverage; Coverdash explains common buyer side placement and its effect on escrow discussions.
AIG vs Foundershield: Representations and Warranties Insurance
Founder Shield lists example seller misrepresentations the policy may address, while AIG describes shared, layered, and excess structures for deal coverage.
AIG vs Gallagher: Representations and Warranties Insurance
AIG describes shared, layered, and excess R&W structures, while Gallagher also identifies SPAC transactions where it pairs R&W placement with D&O.
AIG vs Heffernan: Representations and Warranties Insurance
AIG highlights M&A underwriting and claims support, while Heffernan describes pre-close diligence and post-close insurance planning for acquired companies.
AIG vs Hub International: Representations and Warranties Insurance
HUB says R&W insurance may reduce escrow requirements and offers related tax and litigation placements; AIG describes shared, layered, and excess structures.
AIG vs Lockton: Representations and Warranties Insurance
Lockton describes RWI as replacing or bolstering seller indemnity and offers dedicated transaction-liability claims experts; AIG lists shared, layered, and excess structures.
AIG vs Newfront: Representations and Warranties Insurance
AIG describes M&A underwriting and dedicated transactional claims professionals; Newfront describes deal-time diligence and consultation-led placement.
AIG vs Usi: Representations and Warranties Insurance
AIG describes an R&W product with shared, layered, and excess structures; USI places R&W within a private-equity diligence and deal-support practice.
Baldwin vs Beazley: Representations and Warranties Insurance
Baldwin advises M&A clients on R&W placement; Beazley directly underwrites buyer- or seller-side cover and publishes up to $50 million in limits.
Baldwin vs Berkshire Hathaway Specialty Insurance: Representations and Warranties Insurance
Baldwin offers M&A insurance due diligence and placement advice; Berkshire Hathaway Specialty Insurance describes R&W protection and up to $25 million portfolio capacity.
Baldwin vs CFC: Representations and Warranties Insurance
Baldwin advises and places R&W coverage for M&A clients; CFC underwrites transaction liability with published deal limits and separate small-deal products.
Baldwin vs Chubb: Representations and Warranties Insurance
Baldwin provides M&A R&W advisory and placement; Chubb directly underwrites buyer- or seller-side cover for unknown representation breaches.
Baldwin vs Corgi: Representations and Warranties Insurance
Baldwin places R&W for M&A clients; Corgi describes buyer or seller protection with a 1–14 day quote route.
Baldwin vs Coverdash: Representations and Warranties Insurance
Baldwin advises and places R&W for M&A clients; Coverdash describes buyer-side recovery and possible escrow replacement through its insurer panel.
Baldwin vs Foundershield: Representations and Warranties Insurance
Baldwin advises M&A clients on R&W placement; Founder Shield names buyer-side misrepresentation risks and a carrier-rating threshold.
Baldwin vs Gallagher: Representations and Warranties Insurance
Baldwin provides M&A diligence and R&W placement; Gallagher describes buyer and seller policies, custom forms and SPAC-specific support.
Baldwin vs Heffernan: Representations and Warranties Insurance
Baldwin advises on transaction-risk and R&W placement; Heffernan adds pre-close diligence and post-close insurance planning for private equity.
Baldwin vs Hub International: Representations and Warranties Insurance
Baldwin supports M&A diligence and placement; HUB explains buyer protection against seller guarantees and possible escrow reduction.
Baldwin vs Lockton: Representations and Warranties Insurance
Baldwin offers M&A insurance diligence and placement; Lockton describes a lawyer-led RWI team and post-bind claims specialists.
Baldwin vs Newfront: Representations and Warranties Insurance
Baldwin advises and places R&W; Newfront describes deal-time diligence, analytics and unknown-transaction-risk placement.
Baldwin vs Usi: Representations and Warranties Insurance
Baldwin supports M&A diligence and placement; USI reviews deal documents for liabilities and describes post-close insurance service.
Beazley vs Berkshire Hathaway Specialty Insurance: Representations and Warranties Insurance
Beazley publishes an M&A limit maximum, while BHSI’s 2025 overview states portfolio-wide Transactional Liability capacity; these figures do not describe equivalent measures.
Beazley vs CFC: Representations and Warranties Insurance
Both offer up to $50 million per deal, but CFC adds up to $150 million excess for fundamental reps and sells Buyer and Seller Protect policies for deals under $20 million, placeable within 24 hours.
Beazley vs Chubb: Representations and Warranties Insurance
Beazley advertises M&A limits up to $50 million with tax and contingent-liability cover for PE, founders and corporates, while Chubb writes buyer- and seller-side R&W for large US and Canadian multinationals with no published limit.
Beazley vs Corgi: Representations and Warranties Insurance
Beazley writes M&A insurance with limits up to $50 million plus tax and contingent-liability cover across 80+ jurisdictions; Corgi quotes R&W in 1–14 days but publishes no limits, terms or insurer.
Beazley vs Coverdash: Representations and Warranties Insurance
Beazley writes R&W insurance itself with limits up to $50 million across 80-plus jurisdictions; Coverdash shops R&W quotes from a panel of insurers and publishes no limits.
Beazley vs Foundershield: Representations and Warranties Insurance
Beazley writes R&W insurance itself with limits up to $50 million for buyers and sellers across 80-plus jurisdictions, while Founder Shield is a broker that shops R&W among A-rated insurers for sponsors, strategics and family sellers.
Beazley vs Gallagher: Representations and Warranties Insurance
Beazley underwrites R&W itself with limits up to $50 million for private equity, founders and corporates, while Gallagher is a broker whose dedicated attorneys shop the deal to outside insurers and bundle R&W with D&O for SPACs.
Beazley vs Heffernan: Representations and Warranties Insurance
Beazley insures deals directly with R&W limits up to $50 million, while Heffernan brokers R&W for private-equity buyers alongside environmental, tax and litigation cover plus pre-close diligence.
Beazley vs Hub International: Representations and Warranties Insurance
Beazley writes R&W insurance itself with limits up to $50 million across more than 80 jurisdictions, while HUB is a broker that shops R&W to cut escrow and adds litigation buyout and tax insurance.
Beazley vs Lockton: Representations and Warranties Insurance
Beazley underwrites R&W and M&A insurance with limits up to $50 million, including tax and contingent liability cover, while Lockton brokers RWI with former M&A lawyers on every deal and dedicated claims experts after closing.
Beazley vs Newfront: Representations and Warranties Insurance
Beazley is an insurer writing M&A cover with limits up to $50 million for buyers and sellers; Newfront is a broker whose deal team runs diligence and places R&W, tax and contingent-liability insurance.
Beazley vs Usi: Representations and Warranties Insurance
Beazley insures R&W directly with limits up to $50 million for buyers or sellers; USI is a private-equity broker that reviews your deal documents for uninsured risk and places R&W with an insurer it doesn’t name.
Berkshire Hathaway Specialty Insurance vs CFC: Representations and Warranties Insurance
CFC reports single-transaction and certain excess capacity figures; BHSI’s 2025 overview reports portfolio-wide Transactional Liability capacity, a separate measure.
Berkshire Hathaway Specialty Insurance vs Chubb: Representations and Warranties Insurance
Berkshire Hathaway Specialty Insurance says R&W may extend protection beyond negotiated caps and survival periods; Chubb describes buyer-side protection against seller collectability risk and seller-side indemnity backstops.
Berkshire Hathaway Specialty Insurance vs Corgi: Representations and Warranties Insurance
Berkshire Hathaway Specialty Insurance describes R&W as extending negotiated protection and potentially reducing escrow; Corgi places the specialty quote outside its instant-quote flow with a stated 1–14 day turnaround.
Berkshire Hathaway Specialty Insurance vs Coverdash: Representations and Warranties Insurance
BHSI’s 2025 overview states portfolio-wide Transactional Liability capacity; Coverdash describes insurer-panel placement and a more common buyer-side R&W structure.
Berkshire Hathaway Specialty Insurance vs Foundershield: Representations and Warranties Insurance
Berkshire Hathaway Specialty Insurance lists target sectors; Founder Shield names deal-party audiences and states a general A- or better carrier-selection standard without naming this deal’s insurer.
Berkshire Hathaway Specialty Insurance vs Gallagher: Representations and Warranties Insurance
Berkshire Hathaway Specialty Insurance describes R&W’s potential effect on indemnity caps; Gallagher describes dedicated attorney assistance on transactional-insurance placements.
Berkshire Hathaway Specialty Insurance vs Heffernan: Representations and Warranties Insurance
Berkshire Hathaway Specialty Insurance identifies target sectors; Heffernan describes M&A advisory services before and after a deal closes.
Berkshire Hathaway Specialty Insurance vs Hub International: Representations and Warranties Insurance
Berkshire Hathaway Specialty Insurance describes potential R&W escrow reduction; HUB describes escrow effects and separately lists litigation-buyout and tax-indemnity coverage.
Berkshire Hathaway Specialty Insurance vs Lockton: Representations and Warranties Insurance
Berkshire Hathaway Specialty Insurance states up to $25 million in portfolio capacity, while Lockton describes a deal team staffed with former M&A lawyers and transaction advisers.
Berkshire Hathaway Specialty Insurance vs Newfront: Representations and Warranties Insurance
Berkshire Hathaway Specialty Insurance reports 2025 portfolio capacity up to $25 million; Newfront places R&W through a Private Equity & Transaction Advisory Group it describes as an extension of the deal team.
Berkshire Hathaway Specialty Insurance vs Usi: Representations and Warranties Insurance
Berkshire Hathaway Specialty Insurance says R&W may extend protection beyond negotiated caps and survival periods; USI describes R&W placement alongside purchase-agreement review and post-close deal support.
CFC vs Chubb: Representations and Warranties Insurance
CFC publishes R&W capacity of $50 million per deal, $150 million excess for fundamental representations and Buyer and Seller Protect for deals under $20 million, while Chubb writes R&W for large multinationals with no published limit.
CFC vs Corgi: Representations and Warranties Insurance
CFC writes R&W up to $50 million per deal and can bind small-deal cover under $20 million within 24 hours; Corgi quotes R&W in 1–14 days but publishes no limits, terms or insurer.
CFC vs Coverdash: Representations and Warranties Insurance
CFC writes R&W itself, with Buyer Protect and Seller Protect placed within 24 hours for deals under $20 million and up to $50 million in capacity; Coverdash shops R&W quotes from a panel and publishes no limits.
CFC vs Foundershield: Representations and Warranties Insurance
CFC writes R&W itself with $50 million per deal, $150 million excess on fundamentals and ready-made Buyer and Seller Protect products for deals under $20 million, while Founder Shield brokers R&W among A-rated insurers.
CFC vs Gallagher: Representations and Warranties Insurance
CFC underwrites R&W up to $50 million per deal and binds deals under $20 million within 24 hours, even after closing, while Gallagher is a broker whose attorneys run custom placements and SPAC R&W-plus-D&O bundles.
CFC vs Heffernan: Representations and Warranties Insurance
CFC insures R&W directly with up to $50 million per deal and 24-hour products for deals under $20 million, while Heffernan brokers R&W for private-equity buyers with diligence and related deal cover.
CFC vs Hub International: Representations and Warranties Insurance
CFC writes R&W itself with up to $50 million per deal and Buyer and Seller Protect policies for deals under $20 million placed within 24 hours, while HUB is a broker that negotiates R&W to cut escrow.
CFC vs Lockton: Representations and Warranties Insurance
CFC underwrites R&W up to $50 million per deal and quotes deals under $20 million in 24 hours, while Lockton brokers RWI with former M&A lawyers and post-closing claims experts.
CFC vs Newfront: Representations and Warranties Insurance
CFC writes R&W with up to $50 million per deal and can place Buyer or Seller Protect on deals under $20 million within 24 hours; Newfront is a broker whose deal team runs diligence and shops R&W, tax and contingent-liability cover.
CFC vs Usi: Representations and Warranties Insurance
CFC underwrites R&W with up to $50 million per deal, $150 million excess on fundamental reps and 24-hour cover for deals under $20 million; USI is a broker that reviews deal documents and services the target’s insurance after close.
Chubb vs Corgi: Representations and Warranties Insurance
Chubb underwrites buyer- and seller-side R&W itself for large US and Canadian multinationals, while Corgi lists R&W as a specialty product quoted in 1 to 14 days with no named insurer or limit.
Chubb vs Coverdash: Representations and Warranties Insurance
Chubb writes R&W itself for large multinational deals and pays buyers beyond the seller's indemnity cap; Coverdash shops a panel of insurers for M&A and private-equity deals and pitches R&W as a way to cut escrow.
Chubb vs Foundershield: Representations and Warranties Insurance
Chubb writes R&W itself for buyers and sellers, with seller-side cover that backstops indemnity for exiting funds and minority sellers; Founder Shield brokers mostly buy-side R&W with A- or better insurers.
Chubb vs Gallagher: Representations and Warranties Insurance
Chubb writes buyer- and seller-side R&W itself for large US and Canadian multinationals, while Gallagher’s attorneys negotiate custom R&W forms with outside insurers and bundle R&W with D&O for SPACs.
Chubb vs Heffernan: Representations and Warranties Insurance
Chubb underwrites R&W itself, covering losses and defense costs from unknown seller breaches above a retention, while Heffernan is a broker for private equity firms that pairs RWI with tax, environmental and contingent cover and post-close planning.
Chubb vs Hub International: Representations and Warranties Insurance
Chubb insures R&W directly for buyers or sellers, with buyer-side benefits in auctions and beyond the seller's indemnity cap, while HUB brokers R&W to cut escrow and adds litigation-buyout and tax cover.
Chubb vs Lockton: Representations and Warranties Insurance
Chubb writes buyer- and seller-side R&W itself, including cover for defense costs above a retention, while Lockton is a broker whose former M&A lawyers place RWI and stay on for claims after closing.
Chubb vs Newfront: Representations and Warranties Insurance
Chubb underwrites R&W itself for buyers or sellers, with buyer protection beyond the seller’s indemnity cap, while Newfront brokers R&W alongside tax and contingent-liability insurance as part of your deal team.
Chubb vs Usi: Representations and Warranties Insurance
Chubb writes buyer- and seller-side R&W, including cover for funds winding down and minority sellers; USI is a private-equity broker that reviews deal documents for risk and services the target's insurance after close.
Corgi vs Coverdash: Representations and Warranties Insurance
Corgi quotes R&W as a specialty product in 1 to 14 days; Coverdash shops R&W across its insurer panel alongside tax and contingent-liability cover and explains how buy-side policies can replace escrow.
Corgi vs Foundershield: Representations and Warranties Insurance
Founder Shield places R&W with insurers rated A- or better for PE sponsors, strategic buyers and family sellers, while Corgi lists R&W as a 1-to-14-day specialty quote with no named insurer.
Corgi vs Gallagher: Representations and Warranties Insurance
Gallagher assigns dedicated attorneys to draft custom R&W forms and run diligence, and packages R&W with D&O for SPAC deals; Corgi quotes R&W in 1–14 days but publishes no terms, limits or insurer.
Corgi vs Heffernan: Representations and Warranties Insurance
Corgi sells R&W as a specialty quote that takes 1 to 14 days; Heffernan brokers R&W for private equity and strategic buyers with pre-close due diligence and other deal-risk cover.
Corgi vs Hub International: Representations and Warranties Insurance
Corgi quotes R&W for startups in 1 to 14 days, while HUB’s M&A brokers negotiate deal-specific R&W to cut escrow and strengthen bids, plus tax and litigation-buyout cover.
Corgi vs Lockton: Representations and Warranties Insurance
Lockton places RWI with a team of former M&A lawyers available 24/7 and dedicated claims experts after closing, while Corgi only lists R&W as a specialty quote taking 1 to 14 days with no deal or claims services described.
Corgi vs Newfront: Representations and Warranties Insurance
Corgi quotes R&W as a 1–14 day specialty request for buyers or sellers, while Newfront's private-equity group works as part of your deal team with diligence and tax and contingent-liability cover.
Corgi vs Usi: Representations and Warranties Insurance
Corgi quotes R&W for M&A buyers or sellers in 1 to 14 days, while USI's private-equity brokers review your deal documents and keep servicing the acquired company's insurance after closing.
Coverdash vs Foundershield: Representations and Warranties Insurance
Coverdash quotes R&W alongside tax and contingent-liability cover and says it can reduce or replace escrow, while Founder Shield places R&W only with A- or better insurers for sponsors, strategic buyers and family sellers.
Coverdash vs Gallagher: Representations and Warranties Insurance
Coverdash gets you R&W quotes from its insurer panel and pitches the policy as a way to shrink escrow; Gallagher assigns dedicated attorneys who negotiate custom forms and package R&W with D&O for SPACs.
Coverdash vs Heffernan: Representations and Warranties Insurance
Coverdash shops R&W across its insurer panel and explains how buy-side policies can replace escrow; Heffernan’s private-equity practice pairs R&W with environmental, litigation and other deal cover plus due diligence and post-close planning.
Coverdash vs Hub International: Representations and Warranties Insurance
Coverdash quotes R&W from a panel and explains why buy-side policies let you recover directly from the insurer, while HUB's M&A brokers also place litigation-buyout and tax indemnification cover.
Coverdash vs Lockton: Representations and Warranties Insurance
Lockton staffs R&W deals with former M&A lawyers around the clock and keeps claims experts with you after closing; Coverdash shops a panel of insurers and pitches R&W as a way to cut escrow.
Coverdash vs Newfront: Representations and Warranties Insurance
Coverdash shops R&W quotes from an insurer panel and explains buy-side recovery and escrow savings; Newfront works as an extension of your deal team with diligence professionals and data analytics.
Coverdash vs Usi: Representations and Warranties Insurance
Coverdash shops R&W quotes from its insurer panel for any deal party and says it can replace escrow, while USI’s private equity team reviews your deal documents and keeps servicing the target’s insurance after close.
Foundershield vs Gallagher: Representations and Warranties Insurance
Founder Shield places R&W with A-rated insurers for sponsors, strategic buyers and family-owned sellers and explains pricing, while Gallagher's dedicated attorneys run custom placements and bundle R&W with D&O for SPACs.
Foundershield vs Heffernan: Representations and Warranties Insurance
Founder Shield places R&W only with A- or better insurers for sponsors, strategic buyers, divesting corporates and family sellers, while Heffernan brokers R&W for PE firms with diligence and environmental, tax and litigation cover.
Foundershield vs Hub International: Representations and Warranties Insurance
Founder Shield places R&W only with A- or better insurers for sponsors, strategic buyers and family-business sellers, while HUB's M&A brokers use R&W to cut escrow and add tax and litigation-buyout cover.
Foundershield vs Lockton: Representations and Warranties Insurance
Lockton staffs every R&W deal with former M&A lawyers and keeps claims experts with you after closing, while Founder Shield commits to insurers rated A- or better but describes no post-closing claims desk.
Foundershield vs Newfront: Representations and Warranties Insurance
Founder Shield places R&W with A-rated insurers for sponsors, strategic buyers and family-owned sellers; Newfront's deal team runs diligence and also places tax and contingent-liability insurance.
Foundershield vs Usi: Representations and Warranties Insurance
Founder Shield places R&W for sponsors, strategic buyers and family businesses being sold, using only A- or better insurers; USI’s private-equity practice reviews your deal documents and services the acquired company’s insurance after close.
Gallagher vs Heffernan: Representations and Warranties Insurance
Gallagher places R&W with dedicated attorneys, custom forms and SPAC D&O bundles, while Heffernan's PE and M&A practice adds environmental, litigation-buyout and post-close insurance planning.
Gallagher vs Hub International: Representations and Warranties Insurance
Gallagher puts dedicated attorneys on R&W placements, drafts custom forms and bundles R&W with D&O for SPACs; HUB pitches R&W as a way to cut escrow and win bids, alongside tax and litigation-buyout cover.
Gallagher vs Lockton: Representations and Warranties Insurance
Gallagher bundles R&W with D&O for SPACs and drafts custom policy forms; Lockton staffs R&W deals with former M&A lawyers around the clock and keeps claims experts on after binding.
Gallagher vs Newfront: Representations and Warranties Insurance
Gallagher’s attorneys negotiate custom R&W forms and bundle R&W with D&O for SPACs, while Newfront’s private equity group works as an extension of your deal team with diligence staff and data analytics.
Gallagher vs Usi: Representations and Warranties Insurance
Gallagher's dedicated M&A attorneys draft custom R&W forms and bundle R&W with D&O for SPACs, while USI ties R&W to private-equity deal-document review and keeps a local team servicing the acquired company after closing.
Heffernan vs Hub International: Representations and Warranties Insurance
Heffernan brokers R&W for PE firms with pre-close diligence, group purchasing and environmental cover, while HUB brokers R&W to reduce escrow, with litigation-buyout and tax indemnification alongside.
Heffernan vs Lockton: Representations and Warranties Insurance
Heffernan places R&W alongside environmental, tax and contingent deal cover plus post-close insurance planning, while Lockton's former M&A lawyers place RWI and dedicated claims experts help you collect after closing.
Heffernan vs Newfront: Representations and Warranties Insurance
Heffernan pairs RWI with environmental and litigation-buyout cover plus group purchasing for private equity portfolios, while Newfront acts as an extension of your deal team with diligence staff and data analytics.
Heffernan vs Usi: Representations and Warranties Insurance
Heffernan brokers R&W alongside environmental deal cover and group purchasing across its private-equity clients; USI reviews your deal documents for liabilities and keeps a local team on the target's insurance and benefits after close.
Hub International vs Lockton: Representations and Warranties Insurance
HUB pairs R&W with litigation-buyout and tax insurance for the same deal; Lockton staffs every R&W deal with former M&A lawyers around the clock and keeps dedicated claims experts involved after you bind.
Hub International vs Newfront: Representations and Warranties Insurance
HUB places R&W to cut escrow and strengthen bids, with litigation-buyout and tax indemnification alongside, while Newfront's transaction group works as part of your deal team with diligence analytics.
Hub International vs Usi: Representations and Warranties Insurance
HUB pitches R&W to any business buyer or seller as a way to cut escrow, alongside tax and litigation-buyout cover; USI serves private-equity deals, reviewing the purchase agreement and servicing the target's insurance after closing.
Lockton vs Newfront: Representations and Warranties Insurance
Lockton staffs R&W deals with former M&A lawyers 24/7 and keeps claims experts involved after binding; Newfront pairs R&W with deal diligence and tax or contingent-liability cover for private equity buyers.
Lockton vs Usi: Representations and Warranties Insurance
Lockton’s dedicated R&W practice is staffed by former M&A lawyers and claims experts who say they’ve recovered hundreds of millions in claims, while USI adds R&W to private equity deal-document review and post-close servicing.
Newfront vs Usi: Representations and Warranties Insurance
Newfront works as an extension of your deal team, pairing R&W with tax and contingent-liability cover and data analytics, while USI ties R&W to reviewing the purchase agreement and keeps a local team on the acquired company after closing.