What Are the Key Differences Between Beazley and Chubb Representations and Warranties Insurance?
PE, Founders and Corporates in 80+ Jurisdictions vs Large Multinationals
Beazley names private equity, selling entrepreneurs, private shareholders, venture capital, listed companies and other corporates, and says it can place cover in all 50 US states and more than 80 jurisdictions. Chubb's R&W sits in its transactional-risk suite for large US and Canadian multinationals and their brokers, with no stated minimum deal size. Choose Beazley if you're a PE fund, founder or mid-sized corporate doing a deal; choose Chubb if you're a large multinational already working with it. [1] [3] [4]
$50 Million Advertised Limit vs Deal-by-Deal Terms
Beazley advertises M&A limits up to US $50,000,000. Chubb says its policy pays financial losses, including defense costs, above a retention, and negotiates each deal individually without publishing limit, retention or premium figures. You can size Beazley's capacity before you call; with Chubb you'll learn it only from a quote. [1] [4]
Tax and Contingent Liability vs Winning Auctions and Seller Solvency
For buyers, Beazley describes protection against innocent or fraudulent seller breaches plus adverse tax and contingent liability. Chubb pitches buyer-side cover as protection beyond the negotiated cap and survival period, against a seller that can't pay, and as a way to accept a shorter survival and lower cap in a competitive auction. For sellers, Beazley covers defending a breach claim; Chubb backstops the indemnity, useful for PE or VC funds winding down and for minority sellers worried about joint liability. [1] [4]
What Should You Confirm in Beazley and Chubb Representations and Warranties Insurance Quotes?
- Ask Beazley what limit it will actually quote against the advertised US $50 million. [1]
- Ask Chubb for the retention, limit and whether the policy is buyer- or seller-side. [4]
- Ask whether tax and contingent liabilities are covered on Beazley's quote, and whether Chubb's covers only R&W breaches. [1] [4]
- Ask Chubb whether it treats your deal as a large multinational transactional-risk placement. [3]
