What Are the Key Differences Between Beazley and CFC Representations and Warranties Insurance?
$50 Million at Both, Plus Excess Capacity at CFC
Beazley underwrites M&A insurance directly with limits up to US $50 million and publishes no excess layer. CFC can write up to $50 million on a single transaction, or up to $150 million of excess for certain fundamental representations. Choose CFC if your deal needs more than $50 million on fundamental reps or is under $20 million and closing fast; either can cover a mid-size deal within $50 million. [1] [3]
24-Hour Cover for Small Deals Only at CFC
CFC sells Buyer Protect and Seller Protect for deals under $20 million; Buyer Protect can cover up to 100% of enterprise value, and both can be placed within 24 hours of the application and after closing. Beazley’s M&A page describes no small-deal product or fast path. [3] [1]
Named Underwriters vs a Dedicated Claims Team
Beazley names its underwriters and product leaders and asks you to speak with one. CFC publishes a dedicated transaction-liability claims team in London and New York, says it has handled nearly 300 claims, and aims to acknowledge a claim within 24 hours. With CFC you know who takes your claim; with Beazley you know who underwrites the deal. [1] [3]
What Should You Confirm in Beazley and CFC Representations and Warranties Insurance Quotes?
- Ask CFC whether your quote is its main R&W policy, Buyer Protect, Seller Protect or excess on fundamental representations. [3]
- Ask Beazley for the limit it will actually bind against its $50 million maximum, and the retention. [1]
- Confirm tax and contingent-liability cover is included; both describe them on their core offering. [1] [3]
- Ask CFC which insurer backs your policy. It underwrites for Lloyd’s syndicates and insurers rated A or better by AM Best but doesn’t name them per deal; Beazley insures directly. [3] [1]
