What Are the Key Differences Between Risklytics and Travelers Tech E&O Insurance?
An AI Specialist Broker vs One Insurer’s Modular Policy
Risklytics doesn’t underwrite; it places Professional Liability (Tech E&O) with insurers willing to write robotics, autonomy and AI risk. Travelers underwrites tech E&O as a selectable agreement inside CyberRisk Tech for technology and life-sciences companies, so you choose E&O, cyber or both from one insurer, through an agent or Travelers representative. Choose Risklytics if AI or autonomous systems are core to your product; choose Travelers if you want E&O and cyber from one established insurer. [6] [8] [11] [10]
AI-Exclusion Screening vs a Standard Negligence Example
Risklytics frames Tech E&O as paying when a model or integration costs a customer money, such as a model mislabeling shipments, and says some insurers exclude AI losses, so it screens forms before binding. Travelers covers alleged errors, omissions or negligence, such as lost revenue from a software error, keeps breach response and cybercrime in separate agreements, and describes no AI-exclusion check. [8] [11] [10]
Online With No Broker Fee vs Agent-Led With No Published Limits
Risklytics takes applications online, adds no broker fee on top of premium, and keeps a producer on your file through binding; its customers typically ask for $1 million to $5 million per claim. Travelers publishes no E&O limit or price. [8] [7] [10]
What Should You Confirm in Risklytics and Travelers Tech E&O Insurance Quotes?
- Ask Travelers which CyberRisk Tech agreements are on your quote, and ask Risklytics which insurer is quoting. [10] [8]
- Ask Risklytics to flag AI exclusions, and ask Travelers how claims over model output are treated. [8] [11]
- Compare Travelers’ quoted limit with Risklytics’ typical $1–5 million. [8]
- If you buy Travelers E&O without cyber, ask whether any Cyber Risk Services apply. [10]
