What Are the Key Differences Between Risklytics and StartupInsurance.ai Tech E&O Insurance?
Checking the Insurer's AI Exclusions vs Checking Your Customer Contracts
Both are brokers and neither names the insurer. Risklytics places Tech E&O with specialist insurers for AI, robotics and autonomy companies and reads every form for quiet AI exclusions before you bind. StartupInsurance.ai (arranged by ContractorNerd Insurance Services, LLC) reads your customer contracts against the E&O wording, flagging accuracy warranties and uptime promises the policy may not cover. Choose Risklytics if your product's model outputs are the main risk and you worry an AI exclusion could void your cover; choose StartupInsurance.ai if your contracts contain SLAs or accuracy guarantees. [7] [9] [3] [11]
$1–$5 Million Benchmark vs No Published Range
Risklytics says customers who rely on a model's output typically ask for $1 million to $5 million per claim. StartupInsurance.ai's quote form describes Tech E&O as claims from tech products or services failing and publishes no limit range. [9] [10]
No Broker Fee vs a Warning on Blanket AI Exclusions
Risklytics says it adds no broker fee on top of premium and keeps a licensed producer on your file until binding. StartupInsurance.ai warns that one major insurer added a blanket AI exclusion to D&O, E&O and fiduciary forms at renewal, without saying whether that includes tech E&O. [8] [11]
What Should You Confirm in Risklytics and StartupInsurance.ai Tech E&O Insurance Quotes?
- Ask both which insurer issues the policy. [9] [11]
- Ask Risklytics to show any AI exclusions it found, and ask StartupInsurance.ai whether a blanket AI exclusion applies to your Tech E&O. [9] [11]
- Run StartupInsurance.ai's contract check on your accuracy and uptime clauses. [11]
- Match your limit to what customers require, using Risklytics' $1–$5 million benchmark. [9]
