What Are the Key Differences Between RiskCube and Zurich U.S. Tech E&O Insurance?
Policy Issuer and Claim Scenarios
RiskCube compares Tech E&O policies across carriers and says third-party insurers issue the coverage, while its reviewed line page does not name a carrier. It describes software bugs, SLA failures, customer financial losses, and related data loss as E&O scenarios. Zurich also identifies technology practitioners and possible defense, settlement, and court-fee coverage. Request RiskCube’s proposed carrier and Zurich’s issuing entity and ask both to address your product’s failure modes. [7] [6] [10]
Exclusions and Excess Structure
RiskCube lists common exclusions including known incidents, fraud, and intellectual-property infringement, and says it can layer excess coverage for AI-related gaps. Zurich’s reviewed description does not provide comparable exclusions or an excess option. The difference makes the issued wording especially important: ask for exact exclusions and confirm which underlying policies any excess layer requires. [7] [10]
