What Are the Key Differences Between RiskCube and Risklytics Tech E&O Insurance?
Broad Frontier-Tech Niches vs Robotics, Autonomy and AI
Both place Tech E&O rather than underwrite it. RiskCube compares insurers for AI/ML, fintech, govtech, defense, space and Web3 companies. Risklytics places with specialist insurers for robotics, autonomy and AI risk, and says enterprise customers usually require the cover before your first contract. Choose RiskCube if you're in fintech, defense, space or Web3; choose Risklytics if you build robotics or autonomous systems. [7] [8] [10]
Excess for AI Gaps vs Pre-Bind AI-Exclusion Review
RiskCube says it can add excess for AI-related gaps such as algorithmic-bias or hallucination claims, and checks waiver-of-subrogation language in enterprise contracts. Risklytics says some insurers quietly exclude AI losses and reads every form for those exclusions before binding. RiskCube adds cover on top; Risklytics tries to avoid the gap in the first place. [7] [10]
24-Hour Quotes vs Published Limit Range and No Broker Fee
RiskCube asks for product, customer, revenue and SLA or indemnity details and typically quotes in about 24 hours; it says limits depend on your contracts and early-stage startups often start lower. Risklytics cites a typical ask of $1 million to $5 million per claim, starts online, and adds no broker fee on top of premium. RiskCube's page doesn't describe claims handling. [7] [10] [9]
What Should You Confirm in RiskCube and Risklytics Tech E&O Insurance Quotes?
- Ask both for the issuing insurer; neither publishes it in advance. [6] [10]
- Ask Risklytics which AI exclusions it found, and ask RiskCube whether it proposes excess for bias or hallucination claims. [10] [7]
- Match your limit to your customer contracts, using Risklytics' $1 million to $5 million typical ask as a reference. [10]
- If your contract requires a waiver of subrogation, ask RiskCube to confirm it's on the form. [7]
