What Are the Key Differences Between Marsh and Risklytics Tech E&O Insurance?
AI-Exclusion Screening vs Data-Center Program Design
Both place Tech E&O with insurers they don't name. Risklytics says some insurers quietly exclude AI-related losses, so it reads every policy form for those exclusions before binding. Marsh says off-the-shelf Tech E&O can leave gaps at data-center scale and designs programs combining it with property and casualty. Choose Risklytics if your product runs on AI or models customers rely on; choose Marsh if you operate data centers or need E&O coordinated with other large lines. [10] [8] [4]
Before Your First Enterprise Contract vs Specialist Industries
Risklytics describes claims when your product costs a customer money, such as a perception model mislabeling shipments, and says enterprise customers usually require the cover in procurement before your first contract. It cites a typical ask of $1 million to $5 million per claim. Marsh names technology among its professional liability specialties, alongside banking, insurance, asset management, media and healthcare, and publishes no Tech E&O limits. [10] [5]
Online Application With No Broker Fee vs Specialist-Led Placement
You start Risklytics online; it says it adds no broker fee on top of premium and is paid commission by the insurer. Marsh doesn't describe an online application or fees for this line. [9] [8] [5]
What Should You Confirm in Marsh and Risklytics Tech E&O Insurance Quotes?
- Ask both for the issuing insurer. [5] [10]
- Ask Risklytics to show any AI exclusions on the quoted form, and ask Marsh how its placement treats model-output claims. [10] [4]
- Compare Risklytics' typical $1 million to $5 million ask with the limit Marsh proposes. [10] [5]
- Ask Marsh how it's paid on this placement. [9] [5]
