What Are the Key Differences Between Markel Insurance and Risklytics Tech E&O Insurance?
AI Exclusions and Policy Review
Risklytics says some insurers exclude AI-related losses and that it reads every policy form for AI exclusions before binding. Markel describes technology professional liability for software/SaaS, hardware, and consulting, but its offering record does not specify AI language. A company whose model output drives customer decisions should ask for the actual exclusion wording from both rather than assume technology E&O covers AI-related loss. [9] [4]
Limit Ask and Carrier Role
Risklytics lists a typical request of $1 million to $5 million per claim and places coverage with outside specialist insurers; the carrier appears on the bound policy. Markel names technology classes but does not publish a comparable limit in its record. Ask each for available per-claim and aggregate limits and the issuing insurer before comparing terms. [9] [7] [4]
Online Application and Producer Support
Risklytics offers an online application and says a licensed producer stays on the file until binding, with no extra broker fee because commission comes from the carrier. Markel uses a contact or broker route without describing an online application in its record. If you prefer online intake, compare the producer support and compensation disclosures with Markel's proposed process. [8] [7] [4]
