Markel vs Riskcube: Technology E&O Insurance

RiskCube, an independent brokerage, shops carriers for AI, fintech, defense and Web3 companies and typically returns quotes in about a day; Markel Insurance writes tech E&O for IT, software and hardware businesses.

Kearny Risk organizes these comparisons for firms whose advice, content or technology creates professional exposures.Research updated 2026-09-30

RiskCube compares carrier Tech E&O policies for AI/ML, fintech, govtech, defense, space, and Web3 firms and describes excess protection for AI-related gaps. Markel lists software/SaaS, hardware, and consultants without naming a comparable excess service in its record.

Sources reviewed

  1. 01
    Chubb DigiTech Enterprise Risk Management Policy — Technology E&O, Cyber and Privacy Short Form Application

    ACE American Insurance Company / Chubb · Claims-made notice p.1; §2 Nature of Operations product/service schedule pp.2–3; §7 Technology E&O pp.4–5; §9–10 current and desired coverage pp.5–6 · accessed 2026-09-16

  2. 02
    DigiTech Enterprise Risk Management

    Chubb · Coverage Synopsis > Third-Party Liability Coverage > Technology Errors and Omissions; Cyber, Privacy and Network Security Liability; footer product-summary disclaimer · accessed 2026-09-16

  3. 03
    Insurance and Bonding Guidelines

    Georgia Department of Administrative Services · Professional Liability / Errors and Omissions p.6; Technology Errors & Omissions (Cyber Liability) §9 pp.7–8 · accessed 2026-09-16

  4. 04
    IT Professionals E&O Insurance

    Markel · Who is this for; software/SaaS, hardware, consultants; professional liability and cyber sections. · accessed 2026-09-30

  5. 05
    Glossary of Insurance Terms

    National Association of Insurance Commissioners · Professional Errors and Omissions Liability; Errors and Omissions Liability | Professional Liability other than Medical · accessed 2026-09-16

  6. 06
    Appendix J – Contractor’s Insurance Requirements, Information Technology Umbrella Contract – Manufacturer Based (Statewide)

    New York State Office of General Services · §4 Technology Errors and Omissions, printed p.6 / PDF p.6; claims-made tail note · accessed 2026-09-16

  7. 07
    Disclosures & Compensation

    RiskCube · Section 1, Entity and Licensing Disclosure: "RiskCube is not an insurance carrier and does not underwrite insurance. Insurance coverage is offered, underwritten, and issued by third-party insurance carriers" · accessed 2026-09-23

  8. 08
    Technology Errors and Omissions (E&O) Insurance

    RiskCube · Who needs this coverage; What is Tech E&O; What's covered; Common Exclusions; FAQs; application steps; "Independent brokerage · NPN 21694336" footer · accessed 2026-09-23

  9. 09
    Technology Errors and Omissions Insurance

    The Hartford · What Is Technology Errors and Omissions Insurance?; differences between cyber liability and errors and omissions; How Technology Errors and Omissions Insurance Works With Contracts · accessed 2026-09-16

  10. 10
    Cyber Risk for Technology Companies

    Travelers · CyberRisk Tech coverage includes… technology errors and omissions; businesses can choose cyber protection, E&O protection or both; E&O coverage helps address… errors, omissions or negligent acts in the performance of its services · accessed 2026-09-16

What Are the Key Differences Between Markel Insurance and RiskCube Tech E&O Insurance?

Emerging Technology Classes and AI Exposure

RiskCube targets AI/ML, fintech, govtech, defense, space, and Web3 businesses whose products can create financial loss or contract disputes. Markel lists software/SaaS, hardware, and technology consultants without naming those emerging industries individually. A company building AI models or defense technology should ask both whether the exact product and customer use fit the underwriting class. [8] [4]

Policy Gaps and Contract Requirements

RiskCube says it can layer excess over Tech E&O to address AI-related gaps such as algorithmic bias or hallucinations and checks for waiver-of-subrogation language requested by enterprise contracts. Markel's product page describes technology professional liability but does not detail an excess layer or contract clause review in its offering record. If an enterprise MSA requires specific language, ask Markel for form confirmation and compare it with RiskCube's review. [8] [4]

Application and Quote Timing

RiskCube asks for product, customer, revenue, contract, and known-incident details and says it typically returns quotes within about 24 hours depending on underwriting complexity. Markel invites a contact or broker inquiry but does not promise a quote timeframe. Provide the same contract and incident history to both and ask when a complete proposal can be returned. [8] [4]

What Should You Confirm in Markel Insurance and RiskCube Tech E&O Insurance Quotes?

  • Ask RiskCube which carrier issues the policy, how the excess layer attaches, and whether the MSA language is in the primary form. [7] [8]

  • Ask Markel whether AI-generated errors and required waiver-of-subrogation terms are covered and when it can deliver a complete quote. [4]

Areas of coverage

Markel Insurance

  • role: Markel describes offering technology errors omissions for the audience stated on the cited product page. technology errors omissions marketed by markel; scope is limited to the cited official product overview and described audience. This is not a policy form or a universal eligibility statement.company-reportedSource ↗
  • eligibility: IT and technology service businesses, including software/SaaS, hardware businesses, and consultants listed by Markel. technology errors omissions marketed by markel; scope is limited to the cited official product overview and described audience. This is not a policy form or a universal eligibility statement.company-reportedSource ↗
  • coverage: The cited product page describes professional liability for broadly defined technology services, including software/SaaS, hardware, and consulting examples. Marketing description only; actual coverage, exclusions, conditions, limits, and availability depend on the issued policy and jurisdiction. technology errors omissions marketed by markel; scope is limited to the cited official product overview and described audience. This is not a policy form or a universal eligibility statement.company-reportedSource ↗
  • application: The page invites prospective customers or brokers to contact Markel or the named underwriting team. The page does not establish a quote, bind, or coverage-effective timeline. technology errors omissions marketed by markel; scope is limited to the cited official product overview and described audience. This is not a policy form or a universal eligibility statement.company-reportedSource ↗
  • limits: The cited overview does not set a universal limit or retention for this line. Ask for the proposed policy form, limits, retentions, exclusions, and conditions in the quote. Only the cited marketing page was reviewed for published limit and retention information; no policy-form entitlement is inferred.not-disclosedSource ↗

RiskCube

  • role: RiskCube compares Tech E&O policies across carriers and describes itself as an independent brokerage rather than the underwriter of the policy. Tech E&O product page footer and FAQ describing RiskCube as "your independent broker, scanning the entire market" for quotes.company-reportedSource ↗
  • insurer: RiskCube's disclosures say it is not an insurance carrier and that its insurance products, including Tech E&O, are underwritten and issued by third-party carriers it does not name; the Tech E&O page itself does not identify an issuing insurer. Company-wide entity and licensing disclosure and the Tech E&O product page as read on 2026-09-23.company-reportedSource ↗Source ↗
  • eligibility: RiskCube targets Tech E&O at AI/ML, fintech, govtech, defense, space and Web3 companies whose software or models can create financial loss or contract-performance disputes for customers. Tech E&O product page "Who needs this coverage" section.company-reportedSource ↗
  • coverage: RiskCube describes Tech E&O as covering software errors and bugs, failure to meet SLAs or contract terms, client financial losses caused by the policyholder's product, and related data loss, plus legal defense costs. Tech E&O product page "What's covered" section.company-reportedSource ↗
  • coverage: RiskCube lists common Tech E&O exclusions including intentional wrongdoing or fraud, incidents known before binding, patent infringement, other intellectual-property infringement and financial insolvency. Tech E&O product page "Common Exclusions" section.company-reportedSource ↗
  • limits: RiskCube says needed Tech E&O limits depend on contract requirements and risk exposure, with early-stage startups often starting at lower limits, but does not publish specific limit or retention amounts on the product page. Tech E&O product page "How much Tech E&O coverage do startups need" FAQ.not-disclosedSource ↗
  • services: RiskCube says it can layer an excess policy on top of Tech E&O to address AI-related coverage gaps such as algorithmic-bias or hallucination claims, and checks that policies include waiver-of-subrogation language that enterprise MSAs request. Tech E&O product page "AI & enterprise risk" FAQ.company-reportedSource ↗
  • application: RiskCube asks applicants for product, customer, revenue and contract details such as SLAs or indemnities, plus prior claims or known incidents, and says it typically returns Tech E&O quotes within about 24 hours depending on underwriting complexity. Tech E&O product page process steps and "What information do I need to apply" / "How fast can we get Tech E&O quotes" FAQs.company-reportedSource ↗
  • claims: The reviewed Tech E&O page does not describe claims handling or a dedicated claims team for this line. Tech E&O product page as read on 2026-09-23.not-foundSource ↗

Ask Kearny Risk to help relate this comparison to your services and contracts.

Contact Kearny Risk