What Are the Key Differences Between Cowbell and RiskCube Tech E&O Insurance?
One Combined Product vs a Broker Shopping Niche Markets
Cowbell sells Prime Tech, a surplus-lines Tech E&O and cyber combination through agents, for technology businesses up to $1 billion in revenue, with limits up to $5 million. RiskCube is an independent broker that compares Tech E&O from unnamed insurers for AI/ML, fintech, govtech, defense, space and Web3 companies, publishes no limits, and says quotes typically return in about 24 hours. Choose Cowbell if you want E&O and cyber on one policy with known limits; choose RiskCube if you build AI or serve government, defense or crypto customers and need a specialist to find a market fast. [4] [9] [8]
Broad Contract and Copyright Cover vs Common IP Exclusions
Cowbell covers delays, breach of warranty or contract, product failures, software copyright disputes and cyber costs, and says Prime Tech has no exclusions for guarantees, consequential damages or breach of warranties. RiskCube covers software errors, SLA or contract failures, client losses and defense, but lists patent and other IP infringement among common exclusions. If you make warranties to customers or worry about copyright claims, Cowbell’s form addresses both. [4] [9]
AI Excess and Contract Checks vs None Described
RiskCube can layer excess cover for AI gaps such as algorithmic bias or hallucination claims, and checks the waiver-of-subrogation wording enterprise contracts demand. Cowbell describes no AI-specific cover. RiskCube describes no claims handling. [9] [4]
What Should You Confirm in Cowbell and RiskCube Tech E&O Insurance Quotes?
- Ask RiskCube which insurer and form it is quoting, and whether copyright claims are excluded along with patent. [9] [8]
- Ask Cowbell which surplus-lines insurer issues Prime Tech (outside state guaranty funds), and check its warranty wording against your contracts. [4]
- If you need AI bias or hallucination cover, ask RiskCube to price the excess layer. [9] [4]
- Get RiskCube’s limits to compare with Cowbell’s $5 million, and ask whether 24 hours holds for complex risks. [4] [9]
