What Are the Key Differences Between Corgi and Newfront Tech E&O Insurance?
Standard Instant Policy vs Negotiated Wording
Corgi sells Tech E&O as an instant-quote product and in startup packages, with a published list of base-form exclusions covering contract, IP and AI claims unless endorsed. Newfront doesn't write policies; its Tech E&O and Cyber team places Tech E&O through its Cyber Risk practice and negotiates bespoke language alongside your cyber wording. Choose Corgi if you're an early-stage startup that needs cover today and your contracts don't demand custom terms; choose Newfront if enterprise customers require specific wording or you want E&O and cyber designed together. [3] [4] [8]
Limits
Corgi shows illustrative limits of up to $1 million per claim and $2 million aggregate with a $10,000 retention, and defense costs reduce the limit. Newfront uses its own modeling data to recommend limits that match your exposure, but publishes no ranges. [4] [8]
Claims Help
Corgi doesn't describe risk-management or claims services for Tech E&O beyond glossary and FAQ content. Newfront consults hands-on before and after a breach or claim, and you start with a consultation rather than an instant purchase. [4] [8] [9]
What Should You Confirm in Corgi and Newfront Tech E&O Insurance Quotes?
- Ask Newfront which insurer will issue your policy. [8]
- Ask Corgi which endorsements reverse the contract, AI and IP exclusions, and whether you're with its risk retention group (a member-owned insurer) or a rated partner insurer. [4]
- Compare Newfront's negotiated wording with Corgi's standard definitions of covered errors. [8] [4]
- Compare Newfront's recommended limit with Corgi's $1 million/$2 million illustration. [8] [4]
