What Are the Key Differences Between Chubb and Newfront Tech E&O Insurance?
Published Form Terms vs Negotiated Wording
Chubb writes DigiTech ERM, combining tech E&O, media and cyber, and lists extra financial-injury cover, software copyright, product-recall loss of use and no exclusion for delays or failure to deliver. Newfront's Cyber Risk practice places Technology E&O and says its team negotiates custom language for the broadest terms available, without listing exclusions. Choose Chubb if missed deadlines or software copyright are your biggest risks and you want those terms confirmed up front; choose Newfront if your customer contracts require wording an off-the-shelf form won't match. [2] [9]
Insurer's Response Panel vs Broker Claims Consultation
DigiTech ERM policyholders get Chubb's pre-approved incident-response panel, a 24/7 hotline and the Cyber Alert app, and agents quote it through Cyber Central or Marketplace. Newfront uses proprietary modeling to recommend limits, assesses your cyber infrastructure, and offers hands-on claims consultation before and after a breach or claim, starting from a consultation form. Neither publishes limits. [2] [5] [9] [10]
What Should You Confirm in Chubb and Newfront Tech E&O Insurance Quotes?
- Ask Newfront which insurers it will approach and whether Chubb's DigiTech ERM is one. [9]
- Ask for Newfront's modeled limit and Chubb's actual DigiTech limit and retention. [9] [2]
- Check Newfront's proposed wording for delay, failure-to-deliver and copyright cover. [2]
- Ask who runs your claim under each option. [9] [2]
