What Are the Key Differences Between CFC and Embroker Tech E&O Insurance?
$10 Million Package With IP vs $5 Million Blended Policy
CFC's Technology product bundles E&O, contract, IP/media and cyber cover in one package with a published $10 million maximum, quoted through a broker application or named digital trading partners, with no published revenue cap. Embroker sells a blended Tech E&O and cyber policy directly to tech companies and through Embroker Access brokers, with limits up to $5 million for most insuring agreements and sub-limits for reputational harm, telecom fraud, social engineering, funds transfer fraud and bricking. Embroker's broker program takes private, for-profit tech firms under $300 million in revenue, requires multi-factor authentication above $5 million, and excludes crypto, blockchain and cannabis. Choose CFC if you need more than $5 million or have over $300 million in revenue; choose Embroker if you're a smaller private tech company that wants to buy online. [8] [7] [5] [4] [3]
Clear IP Cover vs Conflicting IP Statements
CFC's brochure includes IP infringement such as copyright and trademark disputes. Embroker's retail page says its policy excludes copyright, libel and IP infringement, while its broker program lists software code infringement as included. If a customer or competitor could accuse your code of infringement, CFC's position is clearer; with Embroker you need to see the actual form. [3] [8] [7]
What Should You Confirm in CFC and Embroker Tech E&O Insurance Quotes?
- Ask Embroker to show on the form whether software code infringement is covered or excluded. [8] [7]
- Compare Embroker's $5 million limit and sub-limits with CFC's $10 million maximum. [7] [3]
- If you need excess cover, note that Embroker's excess can't sit above an Embroker primary policy, so you'd need a different primary insurer. [8]
- Check your revenue, MFA and industry against Embroker's rules. [7]
