What Are the Key Differences Between At-Bay and RiskCube Tech E&O Insurance?
One Program vs a Broker for Frontier Tech
At-Bay places its own Tech E&O program through its producer, for technology companies up to $5 billion in revenue, with limits up to $10 million. RiskCube is an independent brokerage that compares Tech E&O across insurers it does not name, aimed at AI/ML, fintech, govtech, defense, space and Web3 companies whose software or models could cost a customer money. Choose At-Bay if you want known terms and high limits; choose RiskCube if you are in one of those sectors and want several insurers compared for you. [4] [5] [11] [10]
Broad Base Terms vs Gap-Filling for AI and Contracts
At-Bay expands IP cover to trade secrets and source-code license issues, and does not exclude warranties, guarantees or consequential damages. RiskCube says it can add excess cover for AI gaps such as algorithmic bias or hallucination claims, and checks the waiver-of-subrogation language enterprise contracts often demand. If you sell AI into enterprises, ask At-Bay how its form treats AI losses. [11] [5]
Quote Speed
RiskCube asks for product, customer, revenue, SLA or indemnity details and prior claims, and says it usually returns quotes in about 24 hours. At-Bay takes email submissions or automated quotes through its Broker Platform, and includes Stance security tools. Neither describes Tech E&O claims handling; At-Bay's claims page is cyber-focused. [11] [5] [3]
What Should You Confirm in At-Bay and RiskCube Tech E&O Insurance Quotes?
- Ask RiskCube which insurer it proposes, and which company issues At-Bay's policy. [10] [5]
- Compare the actual IP, AI and contract/SLA wording on each form. [11] [5]
- Get limits and retentions from RiskCube; it publishes none. [11] [5]
- Confirm waiver-of-subrogation and any AI excess on the RiskCube placement, and Stance on At-Bay's. [11] [5]
