What Are the Key Differences Between At-Bay and Markel Insurance Tech E&O Insurance?
Revenue and Limit Range
At-Bay says it writes primary and excess Tech E&O for businesses with revenue up to $5 billion and limits up to $10 million; broker-platform automated quotes are narrower, up to $100 million in revenue and $3 million in limits. Markel lists software/SaaS, hardware, and consultants as target technology businesses but gives no comparable ceiling in its record. A large technology company should distinguish At-Bay's underwriting appetite from the broker platform's automated bounds and ask Markel for available capacity. [5] [8]
Contract, Negligence, and IP Terms
At-Bay names coding errors, failed implementations, network outages, and contractual indemnity, and says its wording extends breach-of-contract and IP protection to specified scenarios such as trade-secret misappropriation and source-code license violations. Markel describes professional liability for technology services broadly but does not enumerate those terms in its offering record. If customer contracts promise delivery or indemnity, compare the exact form language rather than relying on the product label. [5] [8]
Security Services and Quote Route
At-Bay includes access to Stance—vulnerability monitoring, vCISO advice, tabletop exercises, and security-awareness training—with each Tech E&O policy; MDR is a separate purchase. At-Bay accepts email submissions or broker-platform quotes, while Markel directs buyers or brokers to contact its underwriting team. Ask whether Markel offers comparable services and which route fits your revenue and requested limit. [5] [8]
What Should You Confirm in At-Bay and Markel Insurance Tech E&O Insurance Quotes?
-
Ask At-Bay whether your revenue and limit qualify for automated quoting or need an underwriting submission, and confirm the issuer on the actual quote. [5] [2]
-
Ask Markel for its available Tech E&O limit and whether the form addresses contract indemnity, source-code disputes, and included security services. [8]
