What Are the Key Differences Between AIG and Resilience Tech E&O Insurance?
Published appetite and limit information
AIG identifies technology service providers as its target audience but does not publish a complete occupation list or state appetite in the reviewed material. Resilience gives a narrower underwriting frame: US technology companies with $25 million to $10 billion in revenue, across listed technology segments, with limits advertised up to $10 million for primary or excess placements. Those figures are company reported and do not establish an offer for a particular buyer. A company outside that stated range should ask both providers about appetite rather than treating AIG’s broader wording as acceptance. [2] [9]
Coverage subject and form design
AIG describes Technology Services E&O for claims alleging errors or omissions in technology services, including third-party economic loss. Resilience describes a form-design feature: its endorsements are integrated directly into its policy form. These are distinct published details—AIG’s described claim subject and Resilience’s policy presentation—not evidence that either contract is broader. Compare the proposed insuring agreement and complete form against your technology services before weighing the terms. [2] [9]
