What Are the Key Differences Between AIG and Corgi Tech E&O Insurance?
Published form detail
AIG describes Technology Services E&O for errors or omissions in technology services, including third-party economic loss. Corgi describes a claims-made policy for negligent service errors, outages, and systems integration or migration work. Its standard policy excludes claims arising solely from breach of contract or SLA failure, as well as specified IP, data-breach, and AI-related claims. Corgi lists possible add-on endorsements for AI/algorithmic liability, copyright and trademark infringement, a contract/SLA carveback, and subcontracted technology services, but availability varies by jurisdiction and underwriting; ask whether one is available for your risk rather than assuming it will be offered. The contract limitation applies to claims arising solely from breach, not every claim involving a contract. [2] [5]
Quote path and stated limits
Corgi labels Tech & AI Liability for an instant quote and gives illustrative limits up to $1 million per claim and $2 million aggregate, with a $10,000 retention. AIG’s page includes a broker-contact option; ask the broker for the application steps and proposed limit for your technology services. Treat Corgi’s figures as examples only; before comparing, request each proposed schedule and confirm each policy’s issuing company. [4] [5] [2]
What Should You Confirm in AIG and Corgi Tech E&O Insurance Quotes?
- Ask Corgi whether its listed contract/SLA, AI/algorithmic, copyright/trademark, or subcontracted-technology endorsement is available for your jurisdiction and risk; confirm which endorsement, if any, is included in the quote alongside the limits and retention. [5]
- Ask AIG to identify the issuing affiliate and provide the proposed limit, retention, exclusions, and application steps for your services. [2]
