What Are the Key Differences Between Coterie Insurance and TechInsurance Professional Liability (E&O) Insurance?
A Median Price Versus Published Limit Tiers
TechInsurance says its E&O policyholders pay a median of $88 per month, or $1,051 a year, with the exact premium depending on location, profession risk level, coverage limits, deductible, employee count, claims history and annual income. [5] Coterie instead publishes each-claim limit options of $25,000, $50,000, $250,000, $500,000, or $1,000,000, without a comparable price figure. [2]
Claims Handling: Described on One Side, Not the Other
TechInsurance says that if a client threatens to sue, you contact your carrier directly, provide policy information and explain the circumstances, and the insurer's representative helps determine next steps. [5] Coterie's MPL brochure describes policy structure and exclusions but doesn't describe a claims-reporting process. [2]
Who Each Company Names as a Buyer
TechInsurance targets E&O at businesses that provide professional services or advice, naming IT and software professionals, cybersecurity and SaaS companies, insurance agents, real estate agents, tax preparers and consultants. [5] Coterie lists a broader set of eligible professions for MPL, including accounting services, architects and engineers, bookkeeping, human resources consulting, interior design and property management. [2]
What Should You Confirm in Coterie Insurance and TechInsurance Professional Liability (E&O) Insurance Quotes?
- Ask TechInsurance which factors in its median-price formula apply to your specific business, since the published figure is an average. [5]
- Ask an agent or broker which of Coterie's five each-claim limit tiers your contract requires before binding. [2]
- Get the issuing insurer from both; neither reviewed page names one for this line. [5] [2]
- Confirm whether your policy is claims-made and whether a retroactive date applies to past work; TechInsurance recommends checking this and Coterie's brochure covers a retroactive date directly. [5] [2]
