What Are the Key Differences Between AIG and CFC Professional Liability (E&O) Insurance?
Coverage Scope and Add-ons
AIG describes claims alleging negligence in professional services, including third-party economic loss. CFC lists a broader set of E&O categories, including breach of contract, subcontractor vicarious liability, IP infringement, pollution, defamation, document loss and withheld fees. CFC sells this in a modular package with optional general liability, property and cyber, whereas AIG’s cited description focuses on the E&O claim subject. Buyers should map their exposures to each form’s definitions and exclusions. [1] [3]
Limits and Buyer Appetite
CFC publishes up to $10 million for E&O and says there is no revenue threshold, while AIG’s reviewed record does not publish a standard limit. CFC also names preferred consulting, educational and specialist classes and lists professions it ordinarily declines. AIG describes customization for service providers but does not enumerate those classes. Ask each underwriter to confirm the profession and proposed limit before comparing price. [1] [3]
