What Are the Key Differences Between Beazley and Corgi Medical Malpractice Insurance?
Built for Telehealth and Life Sciences vs General Healthcare Practices
Beazley writes this coverage for two defined groups: remote-care clinicians (doctors, psychiatrists, therapists, nurse practitioners, dentists and others treating over video) and middle-to-large pharmaceutical, device, biotech, contract-research and diagnostics companies. Corgi pitches its line more broadly at healthcare professionals and organizations, outside its core tech-startup lineup. Choose Beazley if you run a virtual-care service or a life-sciences company; choose Corgi if you're a healthcare practice that doesn't fit either Beazley segment. [2] [1] [5]
One Module in a Package vs Its Own Policy
At Beazley, professional liability arrives inside a wider policy; Life Sciences pairs it with products, E&O and general liability, so you buy several coverages together through a broker's application. Corgi sells malpractice as its own product, but not through the instant flow it uses for D&O or Tech E&O, so plan on up to two weeks for a quote. [1] [3]
What Neither Side Publishes
Neither Beazley nor Corgi lists malpractice limits, retentions or a claims-made election. Corgi also doesn't name the insurer for this line. Beazley shows a telemedicine claim example: remote advice on abdominal pain allegedly preceding a bowel rupture. [2] [4]
What Should You Confirm in Beazley and Corgi Medical Malpractice Insurance Quotes?
- Ask Beazley's broker which application applies (Virtual Care Professional Liability, Life Sciences or another) and which other modules you must buy with it. [2] [1]
- Ask Corgi which insurer, affiliated or partner, will issue the policy. [4]
- Get limits, retentions, claims-made or occurrence trigger and retroactive date in writing from both. [2] [5]
