What Are the Key Differences Between CFC and Marsh McLennan Agency Intellectual Property Insurance?
AI wording and covered IP disputes
CFC says its 2026 IP wording expressly addresses AI model hallucination, AI-generated content, and model drift, alongside patent, trademark, copyright, and trade-secret disputes. Marsh McLennan Agency identifies intellectual-property liability as an executive and professional product but its reviewed overview does not itemize covered IP claims or AI terms. For a company using generative tools in products or marketing, CFC’s stated wording gives specific questions to test; ask MMA for the actual policy language before assuming its listed product addresses those exposures. [2] [1] [6]
Eligibility and application detail
CFC says it underwrites and distributes the policy and offers an online non-binding indication using company name, website, and revenue. MMA asks organizations to contact an adviser or specialist and describes multinational or executive/professional placement broadly; its cited page does not set a universal limit. CFC also states its eligibility varies by turnover and industry. Compare the underwriter’s appetite, limit, defense and enforcement components, and whether the indication progresses to a bound quote. [2] [6]
